? objects from OBJ$.
?
? WORKAROUND?
? ===========
? No
?
? TECHNICAL IMPACT
? ================
? Now no errors anymore, but customer is afarid of future issues because of
? this data dictionary inconsistency.
?
? RELATED ISSUES (bugs, forums, RFAs)
? ===================================
? Few bugs for the ora-600:
? 10161293?91? ? ? ? ? ORA-600 [KQLINVOBJ:USER] CREATING NEW OBJECTS
? 10062629?92? ? ? ? ? ORA-600: INTERNAL ERROR CODE, ARGUMENTS: [KQLINVOBJ:USER],
? [93]
? 9859357? ?31? ? ? ? ? ORA-600 [KQLINVOBJ:USER] DURING CATUPGRD.SQL
? 9832889? ?91? ? ? ? ? [KQLINVOBJ:USER WHILE CREATING A TABLE
? 9664287? ?92? ? ? ? ? [KQLINVOBJ:USER WHILE CREATING A TABLE
?
? HOW OFTEN DOES THE ISSUE REPRODUCE AT CUSTOMER SITE?
? ====================================================
? Always
?
? DOES THE ISSUE REPRODUCE INTERNALLY?
? ====================================
? Not attempted
?
? EXPLAIN WHY THE ISSUE WAS NOT TESTED INTERNALLY.
? ================================================
? I don't have ct env
?
? IS A TESTCASE AVAILABLE?
? ========================
? No
?
? Link to IPS Package:
? ====================
? We have incident tracefile
处理步骤：
? ?delete from sys.obj$?where owner# in (90);--90是[kqlInvObj:user],[90]
? ?commit;