基于日志却采用三种方法来区别增量检查点和完全检查点

2014-11-24 18:55:20 · 作者: · 浏览: 2

System altered


SQL> select group#,status from v$log;


GROUP# STATUS
---------- ----------------
1 CURRENT
2 INACTIVE
3 ACTIVE


SQL> alter system switch logfile;


System altered


SQL> select group#,status from v$log;


GROUP# STATUS
---------- ----------------
1 ACTIVE
2 CURRENT
3 ACTIVE


法二:
理论:增量检查点没有全部写,所以checkpoint_change#没有马上更新;但完全检查点,因为全部写,checkpoint_change#会马上更新。
实验:
SQL> select checkpoint_change# from v$database;


CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
------------------
1716093


SQL> alter system checkpoint;


System altered


SQL> select checkpoint_change# from v$database;


CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#
------------------
1716275


法三:
实验:
SQL> show parameter log_checkpoints_to_


NAME TYPE VALUE
------------------------------------ ----------- ------------------------------
log_checkpoints_to_alert boolean FALSE


SQL> alter system set log_checkpoints_to_alert=true;


System altered


SQL> alter system checkpoint;


System altered


手工触发一个完全检查点,告警日志记录如下:
Thu Jun 07 01:27:17 2012
Beginning global checkpoint up to RBA [0x2d.1e4.10], SCN: 1716634
Completed checkpoint up to RBA [0x2d.1e4.10], SCN: 1716634



接下来手工触发一个增量检查点:
SQL> alter system switch logfile;


System altered
告警日志如下:
Thu Jun 07 01:28:15 2012
Beginning log switch checkpoint up to RBA [0x2e.2.10], SCN: 1716660
Thread 1 advanced to log sequence 46
Current log# 3 seq# 46 mem# 0: D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\ORADATA\ORCL\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_3_7TQZWZOY_.LOG
Current log# 3 seq# 46 mem# 1: D:\ORACLE\PRODUCT\10.2.0\FLASH_RECOVERY_AREA\ORCL\ONLINELOG\O1_MF_3_7TQZX11D_.LOG


从这两个告警日志中,我们可以看到,完全检查点会马上将RBA下移,而增量检查点就会悠着点了。